The Stranger by Albert Camus
Part Two
Chapter I - Chapter III
The way the second part of the novel begins, directly into Meursault’s interrogation, we are again acquainted with the self-centered Meursault. He does not even mention the other people on the beach as they did not have the littlest impact on him. In the first book we learned that Meursault is honest to himself, indifferent, and nonjudgmental. In the second book Meursault is the object and it is society now which is deciding for the fate of this unconventional man. Till now Mersault was living a quite unexaminable life; however, now he is examined by the society. The scene where he is being interrogated reminds him of old crime story novels; that is how unserious the case seemed to Meursault. Meursault’s desire to shake the guard’s hand shows the reader the simple human interactions and when someone is kind. Meursault is just living the moment and does not concern about the past or future. He is still thinking as a free man and not understanding the severity of killing a human being. The lawyer is very concerned with Meursault’s inablitiy to lie about his feeling during his mother’s funeral. In this part now Camus asks all sort of questions that we as the audience asked in the first part. The questions were asked by the lawyer, the interrogators, the magistrate, the judge, and so on. With the meeting with the magistrate we see Camus revealed identity too. Camus being an existentialist does not believe in god, and with the scene where the magistrate shows the crucifix to Meursault,we see a sort of Camus mocking of the religion and religious symbols. Meursault does not even feel sorry for his actions. The magistrate gets very frustrated because he does not understands Meursault’s worldview. When the narrator starts to describe the details of the prison, the reader immediately starts to realize that now Meursault is not thinking anymore as a free man. He is conscious about the things he is deprived of, and that makes him unhappy.
The defense does little to help justify Meursault’s actions. The witnesses just gave comments such as Celeste’s idea of bad luch or Raymodn saying that it was all chance. This is ironic too because shooting a man five times is no bad luck or chance. In his way back to his cell he falls back in reminiscence of the happy summer of the last year. Meursault realizes again that the paths of life could lead as easily to a life of innocence or crime. Where the path leads is not important.